The reason is up to you. It depends on how you think of Christine and the relationship between her and the Phantom. It can be whatever you think. Part of the deformation was his hair being thin and blonde, so he wore a jet black wig. When she tore off his mask, she took the wig off with it. Christine Bleakley. When Christine rips off his mask. Of course the mask comes first and son of the mask is second because a son always comes second the son cant come before the father.
There is bound to be a normal face behind his mask but behind his first mask is another mask. If u remove the second mask, you'll see a normal face.
He mentions that she bought him his first mask, his first "unfeeling piece of clothing". However she seemed to love him more than anyone else did. It is on the designs in the corner it shows a mask. Click on it. Christine Daae studied Opera, different types, learned to sing and to not judge ugly appearance, she was fully accepting of the Phantom when his mask was removed.
Christine has Teacher-Student relationship with the Phantom, maybe a bit of hero crush, until she lifts his mask from his face, she becomes terrified of him. I think the removal of the Phantom's mask ruin everything for the Phantom to get near Christine again. His face frighten Christine. Phantom was furious thinking she was a prying Pandora wanting to see his face behind his mask.
No majoras mask is the second ocarina of time. The chapter is Apollo's Lyre. The page number is Don Simmons. Remove Headgear. Remove two LCD mask seals. Remove two screws hidden under seals. Put your fingers between the mask and the LCD screen and carefully release the mask latches. Remove the mask. Do not hurry; twist the mask slightly to release latches. Remove the mask screw seals on each side of the display assembly. Remove screws. Remove the securing tape from the display connector.
Disconnect the display cable. When the Phantom tries to take the gun from her, Meg accidentally shoots Christine. She then professes her never-ending love for the Phantom How is this possible?!?!
And so ends the relentless emotional pounding of Christine Daae. If we look at the overall arc of Christine's life, tell me where you find any positivity: Her father dies when she is a child. She is then preyed upon and essentially groomed by a man almost twice her age. She's portrayed as a weak enough woman that she returns to her homicidal stalker killer to have sex with him, only to have the man she chooses to marry turns out to be an alcoholic, gambling-addicted jerk who puts her in financial ruin.
Then she is deserted by this man for reasons she doesn't know, has her son kidnapped and then is shot to death. Now you could say that Gustave is the one positive element in her life, I would agree with that. So it's even more unfair that in her dying moments, Webber decides to have Gustave abandon Christine upon hearing that the Phantom is his father.
So Christine is unable to see the one positive element in her life before she dies. If that's not cruel, I don't know what is. But let's go back to the consummation of the Phantom and Christine's relationship. The scenario for Christine to return to the Phantom is ridiculous enough, but had it not been for that night, if you look at the events of Phantom , the only moment where an encounter like that could occur would be after Christine faints when seeing the wedding dress mannequin, which means the Phantom raped her while she was unconscious.
So I guess, next to that, portraying Christine as a Stockholm Syndrome victim is the better option. Talk about the lesser of two evils. It's clear that with the existence of Gustave and this song, that Webber and others had trouble finding where an intimate encounter would make sense when all the while, it doesn't. After the death of her father, the path and decisions of Christine Daae's life are decided by men.
Over the course of two shows, she rarely gets any moments to show strength and when she does, it only serves the interests of the men around her. Webber constantly has her playing the victim. If anything, it should be the Phantom dying on a Coney Island pier, not Christine. Many believe that this is one of musical theatre's great love stories, but my question is, how? If anything it's psychologically manipulated love since the only rational time where Christine could have fallen for the Phantom is when he was exploiting her beliefs in the Angel of Music.
Think about it, after the end of Act 1 in Phantom, where does Christine fall in love with the Phantom? She's terrified of him at the beginning of Act 2 and hates his by the end of the show. Yet, inexplicably we're led to believe that she just can't quit the Phantom. It just doesn't make sense. I would compare it to Carousel when questioning where exactly does Julie Jordan fall in love with Billy?
You could say that the depiction of Christine was based on a show that was written 30 years ago when characterizations of females were different and that the show is based in the s when female characterizations were even more different. Which would be fine, except that nowhere in the show is Christine's abuse based on the social status of women in the s or the s. Also, keep in mind that her continued abuse occurs in a musical that was written in the 21st Century.
So we can toss that argument out the window. One doesn't have to look deep or twist the material to show that Christine Daae is probably the most unfairly treated characters in musical theatre.
So if you ever find a moment, stop and think of Christine Daae fondly, because it's clear that Andrew Lloyd Webber doesn't. I firmly believe her means were not evil or shallow. There was every reason for her not to remember that they were surrounded by thousands of people.
And every emotional reason to unmask him. Most importantly, she may have been reliving the first unmasking situation but on a more emotional and deep level because of the passion of the PoNR and the emotion exchange in that specific moment with his All I Ask Of You moment. Remember how back in the lair, just before she unmasked him, she asked "Who's is the face in the mask? So, maybe she meant to prove to herself and to him, that she does dare to look.
Because she indeed had learned to see the man behind the monster and likely also loved him in some way. Remember they had!
She even said it though not with that exact phrasing.
0コメント